Skip to main content

S62.024 vs S62.024A

S62.024 (Nondisplaced fracture of middle third of navicular [scaphoid] bone of right wrist) compared with S62.024A (Nondisplaced fracture of middle third of navicular [scaphoid] bone of right wrist, initial encounter for closed fracture), from the official CMS tabular data.

Summary

These codes represent different levels of the same hierarchy: S62.024 is the non-billable header that contains S62.024A, so only S62.024A (or a sibling) is reported.

Registry fact
What is different?

Title wording and billing status.S62.024A’s title adds “initial encounter for closed fracture” to the wording the two share (“Nondisplaced fracture of middle third of navicular [scaphoid] bone of right wrist”). S62.024 is a non-billable header; S62.024A is billable.

Registry fact

Can these codes be reported together?

Not as a pair.S62.024 is the non-billable header that contains S62.024A. A header is not reported on a claim, so the choice is S62.024A or a sibling that matches the documentation.

Registry fact

Is there an Excludes1 relationship?

None.Neither entry carries an Excludes1 note that names the other code. S62.024 carries 1 Excludes1 note and S62.024A carries 1 Excludes1 note covering other codes; the side-by-side table quotes them.

Official rule

Is there an Excludes2 relationship?

None.Neither entry carries an Excludes2 note that names the other code. S62.024 carries 4 Excludes2 notes and S62.024A carries 4 Excludes2 notes covering other codes; the side-by-side table quotes them.

Official rule

Is one more specific?

Yes.S62.024A is a subdivision of S62.024 in the tabular hierarchy, so it is the more specific of the two.

Registry fact

Is one a parent or header code?

Yes.S62.024 is the non-billable header that contains S62.024A. A header stands for the whole family beneath it and is not reported on a claim.

Registry fact

Are there sequencing instructions?

None.Neither entry carries a Code First or Use Additional Code note that names the other.

Official rule

Are there other coding relationships?

None found.No laterality, encounter-phase, Table of Neoplasms, Table of Drugs and Chemicals, or history-versus-active-disease relationship links these codes.

MedCoder-derived

Official rule: a tabular instructional note or a section of the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines, quoted as published. Registry fact: the codes’ own published attributes (titles, billable status, position in the hierarchy, code set). MedCoder-derived: a reading MedCoder computes from those facts; it is not itself a rule. How to read the labels

Can these codes be reported together?

Not as a pair — S62.024 is not reportable. S62.024 is the non-billable category that contains S62.024A.

A header stands for the whole family of codes beneath it and is not reported on a claim, so the choice is S62.024A or a sibling that matches the documentation. No Excludes1/Excludes2 relationship exists between these codes in the official tabular list.

Official guidance behind these answers

  • Section I.B.2 — Level of Detail in Coding · applies to: S62.024 and S62.024A

    Diagnosis codes are to be used and reported at their highest number of characters available and to the highest level of specificity documented in the medical record. ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes are composed of codes with 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 characters. Codes with three characters are included in ICD-10-CM as the heading of a category of codes that may be further subdivided by the use of fourth and/or fifth characters and/or sixth characters, which provide greater detail. A three-character code is to be used only if it is not further subdivided. A code is invalid if it has not been coded to the full number of characters required for that code, including the 7th character, if applicable.

    ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines FY2026

Quoted from the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting in effect for the release shown. The tabular notes above are the code-level instruction; these sections are the convention that says how such a note is applied. Source document (CMS PDF) · Release and checksum

Side by side

S62.024Nondisplaced fracture of middle third of navicular [scaphoid] bone of right wristS62.024ANondisplaced fracture of middle third of navicular [scaphoid] bone of right wrist, initial encounter for closed fracture
Billing statusNon-billable header

Report instead: S62.024A, S62.024B, S62.024D, S62.024G, S62.024K

Billable
ClassificationS00-T88 — Injury, Poisoning and Certain Other Consequences of External Causes (S00-T88)S00-T88 — Injury, Poisoning and Certain Other Consequences of External Causes (S00-T88)
DefinitionNondisplaced fracture of middle third of navicular [scaphoid] bone of right wrist is a non-billable ICD-10-CM category code (S62.024).Nondisplaced fracture of middle third of navicular [scaphoid] bone of right wrist, initial encounter for closed fracture is a billable ICD-10-CM diagnosis code (S62.024A).
7th characterThe appropriate 7th character is to be added to each code from category S62The appropriate 7th character is to be added to each code from category S62
Excludes1
traumatic amputation of wrist and hand (S68.-)
traumatic amputation of wrist and hand (S68.-)
Excludes2
fracture of distal parts of ulna and radius (S52.-)
burns and corrosions (T20-T32)
frostbite (T33-T34)
insect bite or sting, venomous (T63.4)
fracture of distal parts of ulna and radius (S52.-)
burns and corrosions (T20-T32)
frostbite (T33-T34)
insect bite or sting, venomous (T63.4)

Notes are the code’s own tabular entry, quoted as published. A note that names the other code is the one the verdict above rests on.

Derived from the official CMS ICD-10-CM tabular data (FY2027). A coding-rule comparison, not billing advice: payer-specific edits and medical-necessity policy are outside its scope. All data sources