S62.165A (Nondisplaced fracture of pisiform, left wrist, initial encounter for closed fracture)
compared with
S62.166A (Nondisplaced fracture of pisiform, unspecified wrist, initial encounter for closed fracture),
from the official CMS tabular data. S62.165A and S62.166A code the same condition on opposite sides.
Nondisplaced fracture of pisiform, unspecified wrist, initial encounter for closed fracture
Same condition; these differ only in which side is documented.
These codes share a category and title and differ only in the side affected. The documentation decides which applies, and a bilateral code is reported only where the code set provides one.
Source: ICD-10-CM tabular list (laterality variant derived from the code title)
Can these codes be reported together?
Same condition, opposite side. S62.165A and S62.166A name the same condition on opposite sides of the body.
Same category and title, differing only in which side is affected — the documentation decides which one applies, and a bilateral code is reported only where the code set provides one.