Skip to main content

S85.30 vs S95

S85.30 (Unspecified injury of greater saphenous vein at lower leg level) compared with S95 (Injury of blood vessels at ankle and foot level), from the official CMS tabular data.

Summary

These codes can be reported together when both conditions are documented, because S85.30 lists S95 under Excludes2, which marks them as distinct conditions.

Official rule
What is different?

The conditions named.S85.30 is “Unspecified injury of greater saphenous vein at lower leg level”; S95 is “Injury of blood vessels at ankle and foot level”.

Registry fact

Can these codes be reported together?

Yes, when both are documented.S85.30 lists S95 under Excludes2: “injury of blood vessels at ankle and foot level (S95.-)”. Excludes2 marks distinct conditions that may both be reported when both are documented.

Official ruleGuide: Excludes1 vs Excludes2

Is there an Excludes1 relationship?

None.Neither entry carries an Excludes1 note that names the other code.

Official rule

Is there an Excludes2 relationship?

Yes.S85.30’s tabular entry: “injury of blood vessels at ankle and foot level (S95.-)”. The note covers S95.

Official ruleGuide: Excludes1 vs Excludes2

Is one more specific?

Not comparable.The codes sit in different categories; specificity is only comparable within one category.

Is one a parent or header code?

Both are headers.Both are non-billable headers, and neither contains the other.

Registry fact

Are there sequencing instructions?

None.Neither entry carries a Code First or Use Additional Code note that names the other.

Official rule

Are there other coding relationships?

None found.No laterality, encounter-phase, Table of Neoplasms, Table of Drugs and Chemicals, or history-versus-active-disease relationship links these codes.

MedCoder-derived

Official rule: a tabular instructional note or a section of the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines, quoted as published. Registry fact: the codes’ own published attributes (titles, billable status, position in the hierarchy, code set). MedCoder-derived: a reading MedCoder computes from those facts; it is not itself a rule. How to read the labels

Can these codes be reported together?

Informational

Excludes2 relationship

S85.30
Unspecified injury of greater saphenous vein at lower leg level
↔
S95
Injury of blood vessels at ankle and foot level

What we found

Yes, when both are documented.S85.30 carries an Excludes2 note covering S95: “injury of blood vessels at ankle and foot level (S95.-)”

Excludes2 marks distinct conditions — both may be reported when both are documented.

What to review

Report both only when the documentation supports both conditions; otherwise report the one documented.

Guide: Excludes1 vs Excludes2Check these on a claim

Why it matters

An Excludes2 note means the excluded condition is not part of the code above it, but a patient can have both. Report both when both are documented.

Source / rule

CMS ICD-10-CM tabular instructional notes

Official guidance behind these answers

  • Section I.A.12.b — Excludes2 · applies to: Excludes2

    A type 2 Excludes note represents “Not included here.” An excludes2 note indicates that the condition excluded is not part of the condition represented by the code, but a patient may have both conditions at the same time. When an Excludes2 note appears under a code, it is acceptable to use both the code and the excluded code together, when appropriate.

    ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines FY2026

Quoted from the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting in effect for the release shown. The tabular notes above are the code-level instruction; these sections are the convention that says how such a note is applied. Source document (CMS PDF) · Release and checksum

Side by side

S85.30Unspecified injury of greater saphenous vein at lower leg levelS95Injury of blood vessels at ankle and foot level
Billing statusNon-billable header

Report instead: S85.301A, S85.301D, S85.301S, S85.302A, S85.302D

Non-billable header

Report instead: S95.001A, S95.001D, S95.001S, S95.002A, S95.002D

ClassificationS00-T88 — Injury, Poisoning and Certain Other Consequences of External Causes (S00-T88)S00-T88 — Injury, Poisoning and Certain Other Consequences of External Causes (S00-T88)
DefinitionUnspecified injury of greater saphenous vein at lower leg level is a non-billable ICD-10-CM category code (S85.30).Injury of blood vessels at ankle and foot level is a non-billable ICD-10-CM category code (S95).
7th characterThe appropriate 7th character is to be added to each code from category S85The appropriate 7th character is to be added to each code from category S95
Excludes2
injury of blood vessels at ankle and foot level (S95.-)
burns and corrosions (T20-T32)
frostbite (T33-T34)
injuries of ankle and foot, except fracture of ankle and malleolus (S90-S99)
insect bite or sting, venomous (T63.4)
injury of posterior tibial artery and vein (S85.1-, S85.8-)
burns and corrosions (T20-T32)
fracture of ankle and malleolus (S82.-)
frostbite (T33-T34)
insect bite or sting, venomous (T63.4)
Code also
any associated open wound (S81.-)
any associated open wound (S91.-)

Notes are the code’s own tabular entry, quoted as published. A note that names the other code is the one the verdict above rests on.

Edit this comparisonCheck a whole claim

Derived from the official CMS ICD-10-CM tabular data (FY2026). A coding-rule comparison, not billing advice: payer-specific edits and medical-necessity policy are outside its scope. All data sources