Skip to main content

V95.9 vs V97.810A

V95.9 (Unspecified aircraft accident injuring occupant) compared with V97.810A (Civilian aircraft involved in air transport accident with military aircraft, initial encounter), from the official CMS tabular data.

Summary

These codes should not be reported together because V97.810A’s tabular entry lists V95.9 under Excludes1.

Official rule
What is different?

The conditions named and billing status.V95.9 is “Unspecified aircraft accident injuring occupant”; V97.810A is “Civilian aircraft involved in air transport accident with military aircraft, initial encounter”. V95.9 is a non-billable header; V97.810A is billable.

Registry fact

Can these codes be reported together?

No.V97.810A’s entry carries an Excludes1 note covering V95.9: “aircraft accident NOS (V95.9)”. Both may be reported only when the documentation shows the two conditions are unrelated to each other (ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines, Section I.A.12.a).

Official ruleGuide: Excludes1 vs Excludes2

Is there an Excludes1 relationship?

Yes.V97.810A’s tabular entry: “aircraft accident NOS (V95.9)”. The note covers V95.9.

Official ruleGuide: Excludes1 vs Excludes2

Is there an Excludes2 relationship?

None.Neither entry carries an Excludes2 note that names the other code.

Official rule

Is one more specific?

Not comparable.The codes sit in different categories; specificity is only comparable within one category.

Is one a parent or header code?

One is a header.V95.9 is a non-billable header, but V97.810A is not one of its subdivisions.

Registry fact

Are there sequencing instructions?

None.Neither entry carries a Code First or Use Additional Code note that names the other.

Official rule

Are there other coding relationships?

None found.No laterality, encounter-phase, Table of Neoplasms, Table of Drugs and Chemicals, or history-versus-active-disease relationship links these codes.

MedCoder-derived

Official rule: a tabular instructional note or a section of the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines, quoted as published. Registry fact: the codes’ own published attributes (titles, billable status, position in the hierarchy, code set). MedCoder-derived: a reading MedCoder computes from those facts; it is not itself a rule. How to read the labels

Can these codes be reported together?

Excludes1 — generally not reported together

Excludes1 conflict

V97.810A
Civilian aircraft involved in air transport accident with military aircraft, initial encounter
↔
V95.9
Unspecified aircraft accident injuring occupant

What we found

No — do not report together.V97.810A carries an Excludes1 note covering V95.9: “aircraft accident NOS (V95.9)”

Sole exception: when the two conditions are documented as unrelated to each other (ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines, Section I.A.12.a).

What to review

Report one of the two. Both may be reported only when the documentation shows the two conditions are unrelated to each other.

Guide: Excludes1 vs Excludes2Check these on a claim

Why it matters

An Excludes1 note means the two conditions are not ordinarily reported together for the same encounter, because the classification treats them as mutually exclusive forms of the same condition. The documented exception is when the two conditions are unrelated to each other.

Source / rule

CMS ICD-10-CM tabular instructional notes; ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines, Section I.A.12.a

Official guidance behind these answers

  • Section I.A.12.a — Excludes1 · applies to: Excludes1

    A type 1 Excludes note is a pure excludes note. It means “NOT CODED HERE!” An Excludes1 note indicates that the code excluded should never be used at the same time as the code above the Excludes1 note. An Excludes1 is used when two conditions cannot occur together, such as a congenital form versus an acquired form of the same condition. An exception to the Excludes1 definition is the circumstance when the two conditions are unrelated to each other. If it is not clear whether the two conditions involving an Excludes1 note are related or not, query the provider. For example, code F45.8, Other somatoform disorders, has an Excludes1 note for "sleep related teeth grinding (G47.63)," because "teeth grinding" is an inclusion term under F45.8. Only one of these two codes should be assigned for teeth grinding. However psychogenic dysmenorrhea is also an inclusion term under F45.8, and a patient could have both this condition and sleep related teeth grinding. In this case, the two conditions are clearly unrelated to each other, and so it would be appropriate to report F45.8 and G47.63 together.

    ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines FY2026

Quoted from the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting in effect for the release shown. The tabular notes above are the code-level instruction; these sections are the convention that says how such a note is applied. Source document (CMS PDF) · Release and checksum

Side by side

V95.9Unspecified aircraft accident injuring occupantV97.810ACivilian aircraft involved in air transport accident with military aircraft, initial encounter
Billing statusNon-billable header

Report instead: V95.9XXA, V95.9XXD, V95.9XXS

Billable
ClassificationV00-Y99 — External Causes of Morbidity (V00-Y99)V00-Y99 — External Causes of Morbidity (V00-Y99)
DefinitionUnspecified aircraft accident injuring occupant is a non-billable ICD-10-CM category code (V95.9).Civilian aircraft involved in air transport accident with military aircraft, initial encounter is a billable ICD-10-CM diagnosis code (V97.810A).
7th characterThe appropriate 7th character is to be added to each code from category V95The appropriate 7th character is to be added to each code from category V97
Includes
Aircraft accident NOS
Air transport accident NOS
Passenger in civilian aircraft injured due to accident with military aircraft
Excludes1
military aircraft accidents in military or war operations (Y36, Y37)
aircraft accident NOS (V95.9)
exposure to changes in air pressure during ascent or descent (W94.-)
military aircraft accidents in military or war operations (Y36, Y37)

Notes are the code’s own tabular entry, quoted as published. A note that names the other code is the one the verdict above rests on.

Edit this comparisonCheck a whole claim

Derived from the official CMS ICD-10-CM tabular data (FY2027). A coding-rule comparison, not billing advice: payer-specific edits and medical-necessity policy are outside its scope. All data sources