X80.XXXD vs X80.XXXS
X80.XXXD (Intentional self-harm by jumping from a high place, subsequent encounter) compared with X80.XXXS (Intentional self-harm by jumping from a high place, sequela), from the official CMS tabular data.
Summary
No tabular note links these codes. Both belong to category X80, and nothing in the tabular list prevents reporting each when it is documented.
Registry fact- What is different?
Title wording.The titles share “Intentional self-harm by jumping from a high place”; X80.XXXD says “subsequent encounter” where X80.XXXS says “sequela”.
Registry fact
- Can these codes be reported together?
No instruction prevents it.No note in either entry names the other. Both belong to category X80; each may be reported when its own documentation is present.
Registry fact
- Is there an Excludes1 relationship?
None.Neither entry carries an Excludes1 note that names the other code.
Official rule
- Is there an Excludes2 relationship?
None.Neither entry carries an Excludes2 note that names the other code.
Official rule
- Is one more specific?
No.Neither is a subdivision of the other, and neither title is the unspecified form; they describe different conditions within category X80.
Registry fact
- Is one a parent or header code?
No.Both are billable codes, and neither contains the other.
Registry fact
- Are there sequencing instructions?
None.Neither entry carries a Code First or Use Additional Code note that names the other.
Official rule
- Are there other coding relationships?
None found.No laterality, encounter-phase, Table of Neoplasms, Table of Drugs and Chemicals, or history-versus-active-disease relationship links these codes.
MedCoder-derived
Official rule: a tabular instructional note or a section of the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines, quoted as published. Registry fact: the codes’ own published attributes (titles, billable status, position in the hierarchy, code set). MedCoder-derived: a reading MedCoder computes from those facts; it is not itself a rule. How to read the labels
Can these codes be reported together?
Yes, when each is documented. X80.XXXD and X80.XXXS both belong to category X80.
No Excludes1/Excludes2 relationship exists between these codes in the official tabular list. The code titles state what each one covers, and the documentation decides which applies.
Side by side
| X80.XXXDIntentional self-harm by jumping from a high place, subsequent encounter | X80.XXXSIntentional self-harm by jumping from a high place, sequela | |
|---|---|---|
| Billing status | Billable | Billable |
| Classification | V00-Y99 — External Causes of Morbidity (V00-Y99) | V00-Y99 — External Causes of Morbidity (V00-Y99) |
| Definition | Intentional self-harm by jumping from a high place, subsequent encounter is a billable ICD-10-CM diagnosis code (X80.XXXD). | Intentional self-harm by jumping from a high place, sequela is a billable ICD-10-CM diagnosis code (X80.XXXS). |
| 7th character | The appropriate 7th character is to be added to code X80 | The appropriate 7th character is to be added to code X80 |
| Includes | Intentional fall from one level to another | Intentional fall from one level to another |
Notes are the code’s own tabular entry, quoted as published. A note that names the other code is the one the verdict above rests on.
Derived from the official CMS ICD-10-CM tabular data (FY2027). A coding-rule comparison, not billing advice: payer-specific edits and medical-necessity policy are outside its scope. All data sources