Skip to main content

I62.01 vs I69.2

I62.01 (Nontraumatic acute subdural hemorrhage) compared with I69.2 (Sequelae of other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage), from the official CMS tabular data.

Current data releases:ICD-10-CM FY2027 · ICD-10-PCS FY2027 · HCPCS October 2026 · MS-DRG v44 · Medicare Code Editor v44.0 · NCCI PTP Q4 2026 · MUE Q4 2026 · NCD code lists 2026-01 · LCD export September 28, 2026 · All releases and sources

Summary

These codes can be reported together when both conditions are documented, because I62.01 lists I69.2 under Excludes2, which marks them as distinct conditions.

Official rule
What is different?

The conditions named and billing status.I62.01 is “Nontraumatic acute subdural hemorrhage”; I69.2 is “Sequelae of other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage”. I69.2 is a non-billable header; I62.01 is billable.

Registry fact

Can these codes be reported together?

Yes, when both are documented.I62.01 lists I69.2 under Excludes2: “sequelae of intracranial hemorrhage (I69.2)”. Excludes2 marks distinct conditions that may both be reported when both are documented.

Official ruleGuide: Excludes1 vs Excludes2

Is there an Excludes2 relationship?

Yes.I62.01’s tabular entry: “sequelae of intracranial hemorrhage (I69.2)”. The note covers I69.2.

Official ruleGuide: Excludes1 vs Excludes2

Is one a parent or header code?

One is a header.I69.2 is a non-billable header, but I62.01 is not one of its subdivisions.

Registry fact

Nothing found in 3 other checks; 1 check does not apply
Is there an Excludes1 relationship?

None.Neither entry carries an Excludes1 note that names the other code. I62.01 carries 1 Excludes1 note and I69.2 carries 5 Excludes1 notes covering other codes; the side-by-side table quotes them.

Official rule

Is one more specific?

Not comparable.The codes sit in different categories; specificity is only comparable within one category.

Are there sequencing instructions?

None.Neither entry carries a Code First or Use Additional Code note that names the other.

Official rule

Are there other coding relationships?

None found.No laterality, encounter-phase, Table of Neoplasms, Table of Drugs and Chemicals, or history-versus-active-disease relationship links these codes.

MedCoder-derived

Official rule: a tabular instructional note or a section of the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines, quoted as published. Registry fact: the codes’ own published attributes (titles, billable status, position in the hierarchy, code set). MedCoder-derived: a reading MedCoder computes from those facts; it is not itself a rule. How to read the labels

Can these codes be reported together?

Informational

Excludes2 relationship

I62.01
Nontraumatic acute subdural hemorrhage
↔
I69.2
Sequelae of other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage

What we found

Yes, when both are documented.I62.01 carries an Excludes2 note covering I69.2: “sequelae of intracranial hemorrhage (I69.2)”

Excludes2 marks distinct conditions — both may be reported when both are documented.

What to review

Report both only when the documentation supports both conditions; otherwise report the one documented.

Guide: Excludes1 vs Excludes2Check these on a claim

Why it matters

An Excludes2 note means the excluded condition is not part of the code above it, but a patient can have both. Report both when both are documented.

Source / rule

CMS ICD-10-CM tabular instructional notes

Official guidance behind these answers

  • Section I.A.12.b — Excludes2 · applies to: Excludes2

    A type 2 Excludes note represents “Not included here.” An excludes2 note indicates that the condition excluded is not part of the condition represented by the code, but a patient may have both conditions at the same time. When an Excludes2 note appears under a code, it is acceptable to use both the code and the excluded code together, when appropriate.

    ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines FY2027

Quoted from the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting in effect for the release shown. The tabular notes above are the code-level instruction; these sections are the convention that says how such a note is applied. Source document (CMS PDF) · Release and checksum

Side by side

Similar descriptions do not make codes interchangeable. The documentation and the official instructions decide which code applies.

Official descriptionDiffers
I62.01

Nontraumatic acute subdural hemorrhage

I69.2

Sequelae of other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage

StatusDiffers
I62.01
Billable
I69.2
Non-billable header

A header is not reported on a claim; a code beneath it is.

Report instead: I69.20, I69.210, I69.211, I69.212, I69.213

Excludes1Differs
Only at I62.01

No note of its own beyond the shared notes

Only at I69.2
  • personal history of cerebral infarction without residual deficit (Z86.73)
  • personal history of prolonged reversible ischemic neurologic deficit (PRIND) (Z86.73)
  • personal history of reversible ischemic neurologcial deficit (RIND) (Z86.73)
  • sequelae of traumatic intracranial injury (S06.-)
Shared by both codes (1 note)
  • traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (S06.-)
Excludes2Differs
I62.01
  • sequelae of intracranial hemorrhage (I69.2)
I69.2

None at this code

Use additional codeDiffers
Only at I62.01
  • code, if known, to indicate National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (R29.7-)
Only at I69.2

No note of its own beyond the shared notes

Shared by both codes (8 notes)
  • code to identify presence of:
  • alcohol abuse and dependence (F10.-)
  • exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (Z77.22)
  • history of tobacco dependence (Z87.891)
  • hypertension (I10-I1A)
  • occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (Z57.31)
  • tobacco dependence (F17.-)
  • tobacco use (Z72.0)
CategoryDiffers
I62.01

I62 Other and unspecified nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage

I69.2

I69 Sequelae of cerebrovascular disease

ChapterSame for both

I00-I99 — Diseases of the Circulatory System (I00-I99)

No Code first, Code also, Includes and 7th character note at either code.

Notes are the code’s own tabular entry, quoted as published. A note that names the other code is the one the verdict above rests on. In a row that differs, each code’s own notes are listed under it, and the notes every code shares are listed once beneath them.

Edit this comparisonCheck a whole claim

Derived from the official CMS ICD-10-CM tabular data (FY2027). A coding-rule comparison, not billing advice: payer-specific edits and medical-necessity policy are outside its scope. All data sources